Friday 6 August 2010

Sátántangó (Tarr, 1994)





Satantango, Bela Tarr's 1994 7.5 hour masterpiece is incredible first and foremost in that despite its length and multiple shots of literally nothing taking place it is never, I repeat, never boring. This is one of the most incredible films I have ever seen. Complied of only 150 shots, many of which last for over 10 minutes, Tarr and his cinematographer manage to create a hypnotic and beautiful depiction of a desolated communal farm in post-communism Hungary. The scenery is at once withered and ugly, yet compellingly beautiful. The land is muddy and the buildings are in shambles. There are two scenes where main characters walk with the camera following as multitudes of trash blow along with them in the wind, creating a somehow hypnotic effect.

The film opens with literally a 10 minute shot following a herd of cows wandering through a seemingly rundown farm town. The camera makes what has to be one of the most incredible pans in cinematic history panning to the left for most of the ten minute scene. Who else but Bela Tarr would try such a thing; and who else but Bela Tarr could make it work so well.

The film follows the people of the farm in essentially three sections. The first section begins by showing Futaki having an affair with Schmidt's wife. Schmidt we find out is planning to run away with the money the town has made over the past year but comes home and is confronted by Futaki who has suck out only to come right back and knock on the door. They hear that the smooth talking Irimias and his sidekick Patrina, who have been believed dead by the town, are on their way back to town. The other residents, who all plan to take their money and leave town, seem to be under the thumb of Irimias and after hearing of his return meet at the local pub and discuss what to do and wait nervously for Irimias's arrival.


A Communist Vincent and Jules!

The scenes are broken down into 12 steps, such as in a Tango. Nearly all of which are connected in that we see what has already happened from another perspective. The first section as noted involves Schmidt and Futaki; the second and one of the most hypnotic in the film is of an overweight and frail doctor who sits in front of his window documenting the actions of the townspeople. He details how Futaki is slipping out of Schmidt's house, and then goes back in, a scene which we've already seen except this time it's from the window of the doctor's house. The doctor hulks around and then realizes he must leave his home to get more alcohol. Scenes go on like this weaving in out and out the story line from different points of view. The first third of the film deals with the realization of Irimias' return, and exposes the corruption of the citizen's capitalism by their greed. The second third is the post powerful. It documents a little girl who is conned by her brother and ignored by her mother. The only thing she has power over is her cat, and in order to feel that superiority she tortures and poisons the cat. I will not reveal how, but this section turns to tragedy which will be exploited by the smooth talking Irimias.

The final third deals with the corruption of Irimias's communist plan for the farm. He convinces them to give him the power and all the money that has been saved up only to con them. This section is brooding with satire, as is the first in some ways, and has shades of Orwell's animal farm – the dumb and obedient townspeople conned into subjugation by the charming Irimias.

Essentially, Satantango is a 2 hour movie shown without its cuts bringing it to 7.5 hours. The film never uses its drawn out scenes to further the narrative, but neither does it use them for simply aesthetic purposes either. The film's length and incredibly long shots seem to be rubbing the atmosphere right in our nose. Many shots have the camera move, raising and weaving and circling defining space like no other film. Some of the extended scenes are incredibly funny in bizarre ways, such as an extended dance seen (from which the film gets its title) where the villagers get drunk waiting for Irimias and Patrina, dancing to accordion music while the little girl peers in through the window; and another scene that circles the room while two officers dictate and type out Irimias's statement, cleverly changing vulgar statements (which I found hilarious) and in the middle of it all, sitting down and having a snack in real time! These scenes sound perhaps boring, but somehow Tarr makes them seem riveting and when they end it's almost sad to see it. Another incredible extended sequence sees the camera facing down at the sleeping villagers circling them ever so slowing as a narrator describes their dreams.

Satantango is a film like no other. Its scope is breathtaking and its style is beautifully crafted. Tarr's films are almost like ballets: the camera moves always gracefully and in ways that we would only imagine that a cut was necessary, never faltering and always creating incredibly beautiful dances, and they set a mood perhaps better than anyone else. Satantango is Tarr's masterwork, epic in every sense of the word. If you get the chance to see this one, do yourself a favor and experience all 7 and a half hours of its majestic and drab atmosphere. Satantango is film for the sake of film and art for the sake of art.

Final Rating: 5/5

Trailer Unavailable, but here's the opening sequence in its glory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj57-Do-O1Q


"The Far Side of Jericho" (Hunter, 2006)




An interesting concept put forward by Tim Hunter for a western. The store of three ladies who see their outlawed husbands hanged and then chased by everyone else in the picture because they are believed to know where the stolen loot is buried. We see them chased by a drunken, incompetent posse, two bounty hunters, a faux preacher and his gang and then, some Native Americans.

They're definitely not cutie-pies and the roles they bring to the screen are not your typical Western female hero. One, Maxine (Suzanne Andrews), is a macha-hero-type but the other two, Claire (Judith Burnett), an ex-school marm with a drinking problem married to an abusive bum and Bridgett (Lissa Negrin)is an ex-hooker who actually loves her husband, Billie.


The film fails itself in many small aspects. One notable thing that really bugged me was how fast-paced some of the conversation seemed to be. Steps in logic just seem to be missed out. For example, all three women lie to one another regarding a map piece. When this is discovered, all three just seem to shrug it off and move on. This is just one example of the many occasions where logical steps in conversation are missed out.

The film also lacks in atmosphere, which is a shame as it seems such a unique and interesting concept for a western. Perhaps the film has too much dialogue, and the wrong dialogue at that. There's no real shift in perspective throughout the movie, as most of the "bad guys" seem to have the same goal, even if they do double cross eachother at any chance given.

While this is not a film to keep you on the edge of your seat, it is an evening's worth of entertainment and I still enjoyed it.

Final Rating: 3/5

Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxxxDZOH11k

Monday 2 August 2010

"Antichrist" (Von Trier, 2009)



Antichrist most definitely has it's own deliberate controversial and shocking moments to it, and yet once you've seen the film you could probably see it working with over half of these shocking moments removed. Some of the horrific moments do belong in the film and work well while others definitely don't. These disturbing shots though, do create the sick and twisted atmosphere that dwells in the viewer's mind for the remainder of the film, and keeps you with your eyes closed, or on the edge of your seat.

The film has a great feel throughout, mostly down to Camera technique and post-production. The colour in the film really helps set the mood, and helps the audience ease into the unexpected. Well thought out monologue's of both Defoe & Gainsbourg show the viewer different sides of the imagination and perception of events. This contrast helps create the sinister, yet mysterious atmosphere the film holds, and it works well! Although not necessarily considering this during the movie, Von Trier has achieved similar symbol-use to that of Andrei Tarkovsky (whom the film is dedicated to). Various shots composed of nothing more than a blur set in some obscure location help create the mysterious aura that is seen in "Stalker" (Tarkovsky, 1979) & "The Werckmeister Harmonies" (Tarr, 2000).



The acting from both William Defoe & Charlotte Gainsbourg is just superb throughout. As a viewer, you quickly side with Defoe, feeling he is the innocent in the conflict, though there are opposing shots through the entire length of the film to counter-act this, such as showing little to no grief over the death of his son. Gainsbourg Porno-Terror helps the audience's distaste of her grow, especially in the cum-blood scene. She is truely terrific and horrifying in the woodland chase scene, as nothing can be heard save her beast like screaming "Where are you?" and Defoe's heavy breathing.


Overall, This is a grim film that makes you to feel the pain its characters do. It will make you shudder, and will send shivers down your spine. But its much more than your generic horror flick. It is an ode to one of the greatest directors of the last century, and makes vast comment on marriage, isolation and mental illness. Definite recommend.

Final Rating: 4.5/5

Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw03QayJ2fU